The graph below shows the annual visitor spend for visitors to New Zealand from 5 countries for the year 1993 to 2014. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The chart illustrates the annual visitor spend for visitors to New Zealand from Australia, USA, UK, Japan, China in the years of 1996 to 2014. The units are measured in New Zealand dollars.
Overall, the highest annual visitor in 2006 from Australia, the lowest visitors in 1996 from China. Australia in 2006 is the highest visitor in the chart but 2008 the visitor are drop down. UK start at 1996 higher level. But going to lowest level in 2002. After 2002 visitor level is up. 2008 to 2014 China visitors spending level is nearly same. USA and Australia visitors in 2010 to 2014 going like a rocket fall down. Australia, Japan and china visitors are drop down in 2008.
In terms, the overall highest annual visitors in Australia. 2006 (Australia) is the highest annual visitors in this chart (NZ$ 2500) the lowest visitors in 1996 from China only nearly NZ$ 100. USA and Australia in 2010 both countries are more than NZ$ 1500.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 232, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'to the lowest'.
Suggestion: to the lowest
...K start at 1996 higher level. But going to lowest level in 2002. After 2002 visitor level...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 257, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...vel. But going to lowest level in 2002. After 2002 visitor level is up. 2008 to 2014 ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 773.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74233128834 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.17925302316 2.65546596893 82% => OK
Unique words: 75.0 106.607317073 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.460122699387 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 211.5 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 22.4926829268 53% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.1905554626 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 59.4615384615 112.824112599 53% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 12.5384615385 22.9334400587 55% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 0.230769230769 5.23603664747 4% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264593044642 0.215688989381 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115372455021 0.103423049105 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0921241659935 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227592235113 0.15604864568 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0925365591966 0.0819641961636 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.2 13.2329268293 54% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 84.68 61.2550243902 138% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 4.4 10.3012195122 43% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.32 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.65 8.06136585366 82% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 4.5 11.4329268293 39% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.9970731707 62% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.