The bar graph delineates information about annual water such as, ground water and public supply is consumed by industries in some nation which is calibrated in million of cubic meter.
Overall, it is explicitly observed that chemicals has highest consumption of water in both sources with 430 (million of cubic meter) and 240(million of cubic meter) while, fuel consume lowest amount in both ground with 70 (million of cubic meter) whereas, public supply with 10 (million of cubic meter).
Now turning back to details, a dramatic shoot up was accounted in the ground water in the metals to 240 (million of cubic meter) while, public supply fail to hold the sour and get 90 (million of cubic meter). However, food and drinks move upward slightly in ground with 110 (million of cubic meter) while public supply with 190 (million of cubic meter) after that there is a sharp downfall observed in the machinery where ground water collapse rapidly to 10 (million of cubic meter) on the other hand , public supply go down to 100 (million of cubic meter)
Moving further, a swift decline was noticed in the paper where ground water drop down to 190 (million of cubic meter) as well as a plummet in public supply to 20 (million of cubic meter) .Furthermore , there had been a sharp reduction seen in the textiles to 80 (million of cubic meter) in ground water and 10 (million of cubic meter) in the public supply.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 161, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...s in some nation which is calibrated in million of cubic meter. Overall, it is explici...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 51, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'has the highest'.
Suggestion: has the highest
...t is explicitly observed that chemicals has highest consumption of water in both sources wi...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 174, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'consume the lowest'.
Suggestion: consume the lowest
...d 240million of cubic meter while, fuel consume lowest amount in both ground with 70 million o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 491, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...million of cubic meter on the other hand , public supply go down to 100 million of...
^^
Line 3, column 545, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ly go down to 100 million of cubic meter Moving further, a swift decline was noti...
^^^
Line 4, column 183, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...blic supply to 20 million of cubic meter .Furthermore , there had been a sharp red...
^^
Line 4, column 185, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Furthermore
...ic supply to 20 million of cubic meter .Furthermore , there had been a sharp reduction seen...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 196, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...o 20 million of cubic meter .Furthermore , there had been a sharp reduction seen i...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, so, well, whereas, while, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1135.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 243.0 196.424390244 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.670781893 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.26633181412 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.456790123457 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 339.3 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 8.94146341463 45% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 60.0 22.4926829268 267% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 204.71565646 43.030603864 476% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 283.75 112.824112599 251% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 60.75 22.9334400587 265% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 22.5 5.23603664747 430% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.389173815536 0.215688989381 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.287792754526 0.103423049105 278% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.057276819628 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.30113457175 0.15604864568 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0427042545551 0.0819641961636 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 30.9 13.2329268293 234% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 27.5 61.2550243902 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 24.3 10.3012195122 236% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 10.69 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 26.0 10.9970731707 236% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.