The graph below shows the availability of various sweeteners in the USA from 1966 to 2012. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The availability of various sweeteners in the USA per capita during 46 years between 1966-2012 is presented in the line chart.
Between 1966-1986, the available of Refined cane and beet sugars sweeteners was the highest with 100 pounds, while the other only less than 20 pounds. However, in 1986 the amount of Refined cane and beet sugars showed a dramatic increase to 60 pounds, while one of the Corn sweeteners showed the reverse. Also, sweeteners by Honey and Edible syrups remained reasonably steady throughout the first half of the period, then the total of sweeteners rise gradually.
By 2011, the number of Refined cane and beet sugars that available had recovered slightly to around 70 pounds and not leveling off until the end of the period, but the one of Corn had gradually risen with 10 points below the former. However, sweeteners by Honey and Edible syrups had leveled off, and the accumulation of four various sweeteners in the last period fell to 110 pounds.
Overall, all of the various sweeteners were fluctuated throughout this period, while the general trend declined. However, the amount of Honey and Edible syrups remained stable, but the total of the sweeteners showed a slight increase.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 10, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...eriod fell to 110 pounds. Overall, all of the various sweeteners were fluctuated thro...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1028.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1144278607 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55679768957 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522388059701 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 298.8 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.6951005187 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.5 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.125 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172395133029 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0865839747147 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0492305169367 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124171916162 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0517682375319 0.0819641961636 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.