The graph below shows avarage number of UK commuters travelling each day by car, bus or train between 1970 and 2030.
The line graph compares the figure for daily travel by workers in the UK using three different forms of transport, namely car? train and bus, over a period of 60 years. Overall, it is clear that car becomes by far the most popular means of transport for UK commuters over the period shown. It is also noticeable that while the number of people who use the car and train increases gradually, the number of bus users decreases steadily.
Looking at the line graph in more detail, we can see that in 1970, around 5 million people used the car to travel to work on a daily basis compared to the bus and train were used about 4 million and 2 million people respectively. Ove the following 30 years, the number of UK commuters driving to work rose considerably to roughly 7 million and the figure for rail passengers reached 3 million. By contrast, there was a small drop of approximately 0,5 million in the number of bus users.
Looking into future, by 2030, the number of workers who commute by car is predicted reach its peak of 9 million and train users will have risen to about 5 million. However, the bus will become a less popular choice for UK commuters with only 3 million daily uses.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 128, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Train
...fferent forms of transport, namely car? train and bus, over a period of 60 years. Ove...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 975.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.4930875576 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44571550829 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543778801843 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 297.9 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.1237973594 43.030603864 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.333333333 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1111111111 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.77777777778 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279767768655 0.215688989381 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125519173721 0.103423049105 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.027787874705 0.0843802449381 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202796286037 0.15604864568 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.038303142122 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.06 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.