The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by car, bus or train between 1970 and 2030.

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by car, bus or train between 1970 and 2030.

The illustration that is showed by the chart is about value of commuters travelling in UK each day by car, bus and train, started in 1970 until 2030 later. Overall, it is seen from the graph that trending information which given is the highest number of commuters is car while the lowest is train.

To the first public transportation is car, as we can see that the average figure of it was little less than 6 millions in 1970, but in every years experienced an increase significantly where in 2010 got a biggest number was around six quarter millions then it was predicted will grow up in 2020 then even will boom a half in the 20130.

The position of bus at the graph was in the middle between car and train, where the number of average was above 3 millions which the one only experienced a down even the prediction in 2030 later will achieve lowest point was slight less than 3. Finally the train, it was the little figure among the both transports with number below the 3 millions but always rose even in 2010 the value similar with bus at that time, along with in the 2030 was predicted will higher than bus base on the rising that will happen.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 204, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...ncrease significantly where in 2010 got a biggest number was around six quarter m...
^
Line 5, column 201, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'achieve the lowest'.
Suggestion: achieve the lowest
... even the prediction in 2030 later will achieve lowest point was slight less than 3. Finally t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 246, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...ve lowest point was slight less than 3. Finally the train, it was the little figure amo...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, then, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 1.00243902439 599% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 943.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.42723004695 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34413855453 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530516431925 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 42.0 22.4926829268 187% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.281671259 43.030603864 168% => OK
Chars per sentence: 188.6 112.824112599 167% => OK
Words per sentence: 42.6 22.9334400587 186% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 5.23603664747 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.351167008386 0.215688989381 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.215381681378 0.103423049105 208% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.141785710839 0.0843802449381 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.255783972535 0.15604864568 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.175771763998 0.0819641961636 214% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.7 13.2329268293 156% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.23 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.1 10.3012195122 156% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.3 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.4329268293 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.8 10.9970731707 171% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.0658536585 172% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.