whether or not someone achieve their aims is mostly a question of luck. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people believe that the speech is part of prey therefore most of people felling lucky when they are asked about their ambition that is reached. There are advantages and disadvantages with this statement, because of several reasons.
Nowadays, the people especially teenager or the younger have a tendency to make sure about their ambition, while that they have a higher mission to get their purposes as well as this is a good matter which happen. For the people who consume believer about the destiny of luck tend to do a great thing. For example, one of a boy student who show in TV has a popular news about his journey, he is from a back water where less of development and attention from government in every field such as education, healthy and the other public service that is needed there. However, the struggling that is did by this brilliant boy can influence his area becoming more better than before, any several grows caused of it. he said that, some people from his rural always tell him about his purposes and about the education achievement that he reached. As result, this story present a message that the communities should be support the children who have an ability in every field. In conclusion, the people who got and success in a mission need some appreciates from the older or the society in environment to encourage them to do something well.
On the other side, there are negative effects will be happen caused by this believer. The first, when the people feel that they are not have a capability and always get an impossible suggestion from communities would make them unconfident. Secondly, the children who do not have a good achievement then often to compare with the good other will influence their psychologies. Finally, the damages would be matter if the children pressured with several statements or something such question of luck.
To sum up, I disagree about the destiny particularly about the lucky because the major reason people reach their aims are about their effort then experiences which they did.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 63, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the people') or simply say ''most people''.
Suggestion: most of the people; most people
...at the speech is part of prey therefore most of people felling lucky when they are asked about...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 356, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'popular news'.
Suggestion: popular news
...one of a boy student who show in TV has a popular news about his journey, he is from a back wa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 595, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'done'.
Suggestion: done
... there. However, the struggling that is did by this brilliant boy can influence his...
^^^
Line 3, column 653, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'better' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: better
...ant boy can influence his area becoming more better than before, any several grows caused o...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 137, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'had'.
Suggestion: had
... when the people feel that they are not have a capability and always get an impossib...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 1.00243902439 698% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 3.15609756098 602% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 36.0 5.60731707317 642% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 3.97073170732 378% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1704.0 965.302439024 177% => OK
No of words: 349.0 196.424390244 178% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88252148997 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 3.73543355544 116% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56321302297 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 106.607317073 173% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527220630372 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 535.5 283.868780488 189% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.6509509495 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.714285714 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9285714286 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.92857142857 5.23603664747 190% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11010992724 0.215688989381 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.039299270951 0.103423049105 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0400855206589 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.076335480199 0.15604864568 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0226754297619 0.0819641961636 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 40.7170731707 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.