It is more important for school children to learn about their local history than world history. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In the contemporary society much attention is paid to education. Over the years mankind has recognized the need for knowledge of history. Some people think that pupils should learn more about their local history than world history. My view, like many other people, is that it is more rational to study history about yourown town.
Many arguments can be found in favour of the view that world history is less important. Firstly, people may never visit countries the history of which they taught while approximately 18-70 years could be spent in home town. Therefore it is necessary to understand what was in the past with this place to understand where it is heading in the future. Besides, to understand, for instance, street and building names,which people see almost every day during their lives, architecture of districts children should learn about their local history.
However, this idea cannot go further that being an immature claim because other people think that knowledge of world history helps people to think globally, to think differently. For instance, world history helps to understand why some countries and cities have developed and some have not. This to some extent helps to understand the history of your own region. Moreover, as a rule world history is more interesting and more important because there were critical and famous events in world scale.
All things considered, the obvious conclusion to be drawn is that for pupils it is more important to learn about their own towns than world historical events because children should know more about the place where they spend most of their lives.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 75, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'years'' or 'year's'?
Suggestion: years'; year's
...ttention is paid to education. Over the years mankind has recognized the need for kno...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 225, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...8-70 years could be spent in home town. Therefore it is necessary to understand what was ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 414, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , which
... for instance, street and building names,which people see almost every day during thei...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, while, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 1.00243902439 798% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 22.0 5.60731707317 392% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1372.0 965.302439024 142% => OK
No of words: 266.0 196.424390244 135% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15789473684 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47494368833 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 106.607317073 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53007518797 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 411.3 283.868780488 145% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.6936813004 43.030603864 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.538461538 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4615384615 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.69230769231 5.23603664747 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.36276172498 0.215688989381 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125841073439 0.103423049105 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11001347671 0.0843802449381 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236945544593 0.15604864568 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0617231708628 0.0819641961636 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.