The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.

Essay topics:

The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.

The line graph compares the emissions of carbon dioxide in four European countries over a period of 40 years.
It is clear that United Kingdom has the biggest carbon dioxide emissions during 40 years, although the numbers keep going down. By contrast, Portugal has the minimal carbon dioxide emissions in the four countries, despite the numbers keep going up.
In 1967, the carbon dioxide emissions in United Kingdom were the highest, more than double of the emissions in Italy. Between 1967 and 1977, the amount of emission saw the dramatically rises in Sweden, Italy and Portugal, while United Kingdom only has a negligible decline. After 1977, the carbon dioxide emissions in Sweden saw the biggest decline and the emission in Italy and Portugal kept rising.
After 1987, the carbon dioxide emissions in Italy has surpass the emission in Sweden and became the second biggest emission country, with around 7.5 metric tonnes. During 1997 to 2007, the emission in Sweden still saw downtrend, and intersection with Portugal in 2007. By contrast, the carbon dioxide emissions in Italy and Portugal remained stable over a period of 1997 to 2007.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 56, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'surpassed'.
Suggestion: surpassed
...e carbon dioxide emissions in Italy has surpass the emission in Sweden and became the s...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
second, still, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 965.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16042780749 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39235343784 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.459893048128 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 285.3 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 19.3103311439 43.030603864 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 107.222222222 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7777777778 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.22222222222 5.23603664747 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.443961654655 0.215688989381 206% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.217605754373 0.103423049105 210% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.047253813962 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.269137950014 0.15604864568 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.095866946257 0.0819641961636 117% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.