The figure provides information regarding the amount carbon dioxide emitted averagely by every person in four countries (UK, Sweden, Italy and Portugal) in a period of years (1967-2007).
Firstly, the curves illustrated that CO2 emissions in Italy and Portugal had corresponding trends. Meaning that there was an upward pattern starting from roughly 1.5 tons in 1967 to reach in 5 tons in 1997 and leveled off until the year 2007 in Portugal, while beginning from approximately 4 tons in 1967, then hitting to 6 tons during a decade, continuing a gradual increase toward the year 1997 and staying in near 8 tons level during the years 1997 and 2007 in Italy.
Secondly, the UK and Sweden had a downward trend. However, the UK’s CO2 production by each person declined slightly from 11 tons to 8.5 tons from 1967 to 2007. In contrast with the UK, Sweden increased the amount of CO2 in the first ten years of the related period, and then declined dramatically from the year 1977 to 2007, reaching to the similar mark of Portugal at the end year.
Overall, the most amount of CO2 was entered by the UK during the given period, and Italy took over the Sweden after two decades. Furthermore, Portugal had the least CO2 emissions during the years 1967 and 2007 among all countries.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 164, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
... tons to 8.5 tons from 1967 to 2007. In contrast with the UK, Sweden increased the amoun...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, regarding, second, secondly, so, then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1067.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82805429864 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52571387225 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542986425339 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 298.8 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 94.7889102163 43.030603864 220% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 133.375 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.625 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.875 5.23603664747 227% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194907681231 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110613889137 0.103423049105 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0692732100656 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152557989763 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0680838758353 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.4329268293 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.