The line graph illustrates tonnage amount of carbon dioxide produced by the UK, Sweden, Italy and Portugal varied from 1967 to 2007.
Overall, it can be observed that emissions of carbon dioxide were huge by the people of the UK which afterwards decreased throughout the period. While, emission of carbon dioxide were increased by Italian and Portuguese at the end.
To begin with, carbon dioxide produced by habitant of the UK were around 10.5 metric tones in1967 which remained steady till1977. In 1987, emission of carbon dioxide were gradual decrease till end of the period and stood at 8.5 metric tonnes. However, nearly 8.3 metric tonnes carbon dioxide were produced by Swedish in 1967 than it peaked up around 10.1 metric tonnes in 1977 and dripped out roughly 7 metric tonnes in 1987. Then after, it was decreased minimally till 2007, to 5.9 metric tonnes.
On the other hand, Italian produced carbon dioxide around 4.1 metric tonnes in 1967 which grew sharply till 1997, to 6.9 metric tonnes and remained unchanged to end of the period. Additionally, carbon dioxide emerge by Portuguese was nearly 1.7 metric tonnes in 197 which, sharp rise throughout the period and stood at 4.8 metric tonnes in 2007.
- The chart below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they are received from employers 67
- The chart shows the number of mobile phones and landlines per 100 people in selected countries Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information given You should write at least 150 words 56
- The table below shows the number of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and year after It was refurbished The charts showed a result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit during the same two periods 73
- The table below shows the results of a 20 year study into why adults in the UK attend arts events Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 69
- The diagrams below show how chocolate is made and how the price of a chocolate bar is divided up among those involved in the process Summary the information by choosing and reporting the key features and make any relevant comparisons 46
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 347, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and stood at 4.8 metric tonnes in 2007.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, then, while, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1020.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02463054187 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31572157862 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507389162562 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 293.4 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.7755957728 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.333333333 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5555555556 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143797780939 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0838489136823 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.057751132214 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125788801152 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0663179886843 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.