The line graph demonstrates the number of visitors visited on the Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017. The scale is in millions of visitors.
Overall, it can be apparently observed that the number of tourists was increased throughout the period. In the initial year, people preferred to live on island which was overtaken by staying on a cruise ship at end of the period.
In the year 2010, around 0.7 million visitors took a visit to the island, and staying there remained steady till 2011. In two subsequent years visit to the island was spiked and reached 1.5 million tourists at a time. Afterward, there was no change witnessed in the next three years. However, in 2016, visitors decreased and accounted for 1.3 million and again it set back its original value of 1.5 million at the end of the year.
Moreover, people who favor staying on cruise ware negligible at the beginning which fluctuate in till 2013. Then, it was accelerated and most of the people preferred to stay on a cruise ships for the remaining years. In the end, it was overtaken by cruise ship and almost 2 million people love to live on a cruise ship, in 2017. In the initial year, total visitors recorded for 1 million which grew rapidly 3 times more in 7 years and in the end it claimed for 3.5 million
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 464, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and in the end it claimed for 35 million
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, however, moreover, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1029.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 229.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.49344978166 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42337227161 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.475982532751 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 307.8 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 229.0 22.4926829268 1018% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1029.0 112.824112599 912% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 229.0 22.9334400587 999% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 35.0 5.23603664747 668% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.104480556922 0.215688989381 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104480556922 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105392151042 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100562916125 0.0819641961636 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 114.2 13.2329268293 863% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -135.58 61.2550243902 -221% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 89.1 10.3012195122 865% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 10.24 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 17.48 8.06136585366 217% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 54.0 11.4329268293 472% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 93.6 10.9970731707 851% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 94.0 11.0658536585 849% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.