The line graph demonstrates the amount of food consume by habitant of Australian in time period of two and half decades. The scale is number of times food were eaten in the year.
Overall, it can be observed that in the initial year Fish and chips were popular as food to intake witch overtaken by Hamburgers at the end of the period. While, popularity of pizza was increased with the time.
To begin with, fish and chips were nearly 100 times taken by people, in 1975. After that, it was decreased gradually around 82 times per year in 1980 and suddenly picked up by 6 times per year in 1985. However, intake of fish and chips were dropped sharply till end of the year and stood at 40 times per year.
On the other hand, consumption of pizza was nearly 1 time per year which rise slowly roughly 40 times per year, in 1985. Then after, grew sharply up-to 82 times per year, in 1995 and remained constant till 2000. Moreover, intake of hamburgers nearly negligible in the initial year which rapid rise approximately 81 times per year, in 1985 and then dramatic rise around 100 times per year, in 1995 and remained stable till end of the period.
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- In many countries around the world young people decide to leave their parents home once they finish school They start living on their own or sharing a home with friends Do you agree or disagree with this approach Give your opinion 56
- The major cities in the world are growing fast as well as their problems What are the problems that young people living in cities are facing with Give solutions to these problems 73
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kindom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount of fast food eaten by teenagers from Australia for 1975 to 2000 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 156, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...by Hamburgers at the end of the period. While, popularity of pizza was increased with...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, moreover, then, while, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 946.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.52631578947 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.23489539935 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497607655502 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.44058216 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.6 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0558463481169 0.215688989381 26% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0388232330351 0.103423049105 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0544512111072 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.060764262875 0.15604864568 39% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0757536970291 0.0819641961636 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.99 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.