The graph below shows the average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
the line graph illustrates the amount of carbon dioxide was generrated by individual in four different countries during the period of 40 years starting in 1976.
Overall, it is clear that, the CO2 emissions in Portug and Italy considerably increase throughout the period. In contrast, United Kingdom and Sweden experienced an decresea in the average carbon dioxide emissions.
As can be seen, people in Portug disposed the lowest carbon dioxide in 1967, about 0.7 metric tonnes. This figure went up significanlty to 4.8 metric tonnes in final year. The amount of carbon dioxide emissions in Italy showed the same trend with Portug, from approximately 4 metric tonnes in 1967, this figure then increased to nearly 8 metric tonnes in 2007.
By contrast, there was a gradually decreased during the period from 10.8 metric tonnes in 1967 to 8.3 metric tonnes in 2007. However, this figure still higher than figures in three others countries. In Sweden, average carbon dioxie showed a fluctuation, from 8.2 metric tonnes in 1967, this figure increased just above 10 metric tonnes in the next 10 years before dropping to 4.8 metric tonnes in the final year.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
the line graph illustrates the amount of ca...
^^^
Line 2, column 161, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
..., United Kingdom and Sweden experienced an decresea in the average carbon dioxide ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, still, then, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 967.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08947368421 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55113358107 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552631578947 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.2228758125 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.444444444 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1111111111 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11111111111 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186555193074 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0929208481095 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0692531425216 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137468816902 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0759491072364 0.0819641961636 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.