The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Given graph shows average carbon dioxide emission per person in four different region of the world, UK,
Sweden, Italy and Portugal in the person in the periods of 40 years that is from 1967 to 2007.
The emission of carbon dioxide per person has been plunged to approximately 9 metric tonne from 11 metric tonne in UK. However, the same cannot be said for the rest of the three countries. As in Italy and and Portugal, similar trend of increase in carbon dioxide emission can be observed. Whereas, looking at Sweden, the amount of emission of carbon dioxide was initially 8-9 metric tonne which rapidly rose to 10 metric tonne (approximately) over the period of the 10 years and subsequently reduced to 5 metric tonne in next 30 years. The emission has been steeped down at varying rate between 1977 to 2007 as the rate of the high in the first 10 years, after which the slope has been decreased.
Though the trend is similar in Italy and Portugal but the emission is not started at the same amount in 1967. Initially, the emission in Portugal started at 1 metric tonne and in Italy it was 4 metric tonne. The emission in both the countries escalated over time and recorded 5.5 metric tonne and 7.5 metric tonne respectively. Graph depicts out of four countries two of them has increased emission and two has decreased between 1967 to 2007.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 80, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'region' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'regions'.
Suggestion: regions
...e emission per person in four different region of the world, UK, Sweden, Italy and P...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 104, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... four different region of the world, UK, Sweden, Italy and Portugal in the person...
^^^
Line 4, column 86, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'tonne' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'tonnes'.
Suggestion: tonnes
... been plunged to approximately 9 metric tonne from 11 metric tonne in UK. However, th...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 107, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'tonne' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'tonnes'.
Suggestion: tonnes
...oximately 9 metric tonne from 11 metric tonne in UK. However, the same cannot be said...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 202, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: and
...est of the three countries. As in Italy and and Portugal, similar trend of increase in ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 422, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'tonne' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'tonnes'.
Suggestion: tonnes
...c tonne which rapidly rose to 10 metric tonne approximately over the period of the 10...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 511, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'tonne' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'tonnes'.
Suggestion: tonnes
...rs and subsequently reduced to 5 metric tonne in next 30 years. The emission has been...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, look, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1109.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 238.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65966386555 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43072583339 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.466386554622 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 333.0 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.4429380588 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.9 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.2 5.23603664747 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237424078847 0.215688989381 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111704335106 0.103423049105 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0939272473462 0.0843802449381 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193957404121 0.15604864568 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0522707420153 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.23 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.