The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The following line graph illustrates average carbon dioxide emissions for a person in four western countries.
As the graph illuminates, the amounts of carbon dioxide emissions in italy and Portugal have risen steadily; by contrast, the figures for these amounts in uk and Sweden have seen a constant fall, with a decade-long exception for Sweden.
In 1967, as the graph clearly shows, uk has the highest amount of carbon dioxide emissions for a person with this amount reaching 11 metric tons. Sweden, italy and Portugal are the second, third and the fourth countries in terms of carbon dioxide emissions with amounts exceeding 8, 4, and 1 metric tons, respectively. However, a decade later, the trend started to transform slowly with a smooth fall in the amount of carbon dioxide emissions in the uk. Afterwards, the figure for uk went down to almost 8 metric tons in 2007. Similarly, the figure for Sweden saw a decline in the amount but very sharply and met the slowly-rising figure for Portugal in 2007, which had as low amounts as 5.5 metric tons of carbon dioxide emission in 2007. italy, in a same manner, confronted a slighter rise, in a comparison to the previous decade, and remained relatively stable in the last decade producing 8 metric tons of carbon dioxide emissions.
- the graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK 73
- You had arranged to meet a friend next week but you have realized that you won t be able to go Write a letter to your friend In your letter cancel the meeting with your friend and apologize explain why you will not be able to meet your friend suggest wher 56
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 38
Comments
I really enjoyed the website.
I really enjoyed the website.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The following line graph illustrates ave...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... a person in four western countries. As the graph illuminates, the amounts of...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 250, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ith a decade-long exception for Sweden. In 1967, as the graph clearl...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 753, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Italy
...ons of carbon dioxide emission in 2007. italy, in a same manner, confronted a slighte...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 760, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a same manner" with adverb for "same"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...carbon dioxide emission in 2007. italy, in a same manner, confronted a slighter rise, in a compa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 949, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...etric tons of carbon dioxide emissions.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, second, similarly, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1078.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96774193548 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67548729833 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511520737327 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 327.6 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.3467075381 43.030603864 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.75 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.125 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221335467278 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119194116733 0.103423049105 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0504096754681 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175089594819 0.15604864568 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0201789203727 0.0819641961636 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.2329268293 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.