the graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK
The line graph below illuminates the amounts of goods transferred in the UK over a period of 28 years by road, water, rail, and pipeline.
As the graph illustrates, the amounts of goods transported by road is by far the highest quantity over this 28-year period.
In 1974, the figures for water and rail-transported goods coincided at relatively 40 million tons. However, the line for road-transmitted goods elucidates that well above 70 million tons of goods are transported in the roads. By contrast, the figure for pipeline transportation shows a negligible quantity of nearly 5 million tons. The trend is relatively similar until 21 years later where the line for road transportation saw a steep rise to a peak of 100 million tons in 2002. This is true for quantities transferred by rail. The line is illustrated to have increased to an apex of more than 60 million tons in 2002. Conversely, the figure for water-transported goods confronted a slight fall till 1998, where it increased suddenly to a summit of over 40 million tons in 2002. Nevertheless, the amount of good transmitted by pipeline stayed perfectly stable at a negligible amount of over 20 million tons till 2002.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 11, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'graphs'.
Suggestion: graphs
The line graph below illuminates the amounts of goods ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 920, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ount of over 20 million tons till 2002.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, however, nevertheless, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 991.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97989949749 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16557389096 2.65546596893 119% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522613065327 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 288.9 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.0111270353 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.1 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.9 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290421838885 0.215688989381 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126322719004 0.103423049105 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0844050180682 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226268408819 0.15604864568 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0356549224016 0.0819641961636 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.