The graph below shows average carbon dioxide emission per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy, and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
The given line graph reveals the information about the carbon dioxide emission per person by United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy, and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. The data is calibroted in metric tonnes.
Generally, it is evident that the maximum emission of carbon dioxide by the United Kingdom but on the other hand the least emission of carbon dioxide by the Portugal.
It can be seen that, during the year 1967 in the political only 1 metric tonnes and the last in the year 2007 it was emission of carbon dioxide at 5 metric tonnes. Whereas, the emission of carbon dioxide in Italy increased in year 1967 to 2007 at 4 metric tonnes to 7 metric tonnes.
In addition to this, the emission of carbon dioxide in Sweden has been decreasing during the year 1967 to 2007 at 8 metric tonnes to 4 metric tonnes. As well as, the highest emission of carbon dioxide in United Kingdom has decreased from 11 metric tonnes to 9 metric tonnes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 165, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...n of carbon dioxide at 5 metric tonnes. Whereas, the emission of carbon dioxide in Ital...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, well, whereas, in addition, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 772.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.65060240964 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33939793474 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 77.0 106.607317073 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.463855421687 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 233.1 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1537683944 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.285714286 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7142857143 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.42857142857 5.23603664747 180% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.400551522646 0.215688989381 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.231706622276 0.103423049105 224% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.185069728236 0.0843802449381 219% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.308887819783 0.15604864568 198% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.148119596947 0.0819641961636 181% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.99 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.