The graph below shows the average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Portugal and Italy between 1967 and 2007.
Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The poly line graph illustrates the information about the level of released carbon dioxide by per person which was in four decades from 1976 to 2007 in four various regions ( United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal) .
In overall, the United Kingdom constituted a major for carbon dioxide emissions per humans since the least amount of CO2 was releasing by Portugal. However, a significant disparity can be noticed in all nations over the periods. Units were measured in metric tonnes.
With regards, it can be seen from the information that the United Kingdom attained a higher figure for emission of carbon dioxide by per person during the given periods which accounted at over a 10 metric tonnes in ten years periods. After this, between 1987 and 2007, it declined slightly at less than a ten metric tonnes in the England. Likewise, Portugal experienced at lowest for spreading CO2 in given time periods as well as from 1967 it was less than a 2 metric tonnes. Interestingly, the amount of emission of carbon dioxide by Portugal observed at more than a 4 metric tonnes in the end of the period.
The graph further proves that Sweden noticed at around 10 metric tonnes for released CO2 in the bingeing of the period and it started drastic inclined and reached to peak at less than a 12 metric tonnes after ten-year periods. In contrast, the CO2 emission per person in Sweden showed a continuously dropped trend at experienced at remained relatively constant with Portugal at about 6 metric tonnes in the last year. Furthermore, only upon 4 metric tonnes carbon dioxide released by Italy during 1967. Whilst, it raised at over 6 metric tonnes between 1977 after that it remained stable in 1987. Lastly, the amount of CO2 emission per person by Italy were found at around 8 metric tonnes of the total percentage from 1997 to 2007.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 173, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rom 1976 to 2007 in four various regions United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portug...
^^
Line 1, column 217, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ited Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal . In overall, the United Kingdom con...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, lastly, likewise, so, well, in contrast, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 33.7804878049 192% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1531.0 965.302439024 159% => OK
No of words: 314.0 196.424390244 160% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87579617834 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 3.73543355544 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52969464585 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 106.607317073 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.46178343949 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 465.3 283.868780488 164% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.2392601307 43.030603864 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.769230769 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1538461538 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.92307692308 5.23603664747 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226644193992 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10064642933 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0724071543048 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175552000956 0.15604864568 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0584754119714 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 40.7170731707 169% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.