The graph below shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the united kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007
the line graph illustrates the rate of emissions carbon dioxide as per person .Graph shows the data for various six areas in given time period 1967 to 2007
To begin with, it is clearly established that united kingdom was dominant for emissions rate in year 1967, at 10.8 tonnes. Followed by Sweden, remarkably lower than UK, but , considerably higher than other sectors , at 8.5 tonnes. A further italy shows gas discharge raate was only 4.2 tonnes. while, the impact of this on Portugal was minimal .However, it saw least parportion only 1 tonne in begining year.
Furthermore, after 10 year, only Uk followed decreasing trend while, others follow increasing trend . However, after 20 years, sweden saw dramatic decrease . In the last , passing 40 year period , two areas follow increasing trend nd other two follow decreasing trend.
Overall, it is clear evident from graph , in the begining period gas emissions rate was very less in Italy and Portugal but at the end it saw increase with approximately 4 tonnes
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the united kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 78
- The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbised. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.summar 84
- The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country. Summqrise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- In many parts of the world there is continous coverage of sports on television.some people believe this discourages the young from taking part in any sport themselves. 61
- Scientist predict in the near future cars will be driven by computers, not people. Why? Do you think it is a postive or negative development? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
the line graph illustrates the rate of emis...
^^^
Line 1, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...f emissions carbon dioxide as per person .Graph shows the data for various six are...
^^
Line 1, column 80, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Graph
...emissions carbon dioxide as per person .Graph shows the data for various six areas in...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 173, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...by Sweden, remarkably lower than UK, but , considerably higher than other sectors ...
^^
Line 3, column 214, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
..., considerably higher than other sectors , at 8.5 tonnes. A further italy shows ga...
^^
Line 3, column 295, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...as discharge raate was only 4.2 tonnes. while, the impact of this on Portugal was min...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 295, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “while” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...as discharge raate was only 4.2 tonnes. while, the impact of this on Portugal was min...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 344, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...e impact of this on Portugal was minimal .However, it saw least parportion only 1 ...
^^
Line 3, column 346, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
...impact of this on Portugal was minimal .However, it saw least parportion only 1 tonne i...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 62, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... year, only Uk followed decreasing trend while, others follow increasing trend . ...
^^
Line 5, column 101, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...d while, others follow increasing trend . However, after 20 years, sweden saw dra...
^^
Line 5, column 157, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...r 20 years, sweden saw dramatic decrease . In the last , passing 40 year period , ...
^^
Line 5, column 171, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...eden saw dramatic decrease . In the last , passing 40 year period , two areas foll...
^^
Line 5, column 196, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...e . In the last , passing 40 year period , two areas follow increasing trend nd ot...
^^
Line 5, column 264, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'trend' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'trends'.
Suggestion: trends
...ng trend nd other two follow decreasing trend. Overall, it is clear evident from ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 40, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... Overall, it is clear evident from graph , in the begining period gas emissions ra...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, so, while, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 850.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05952380952 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59359336262 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.678571428571 0.547539520022 124% => OK
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.1935434994 43.030603864 158% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.25 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 16.0 1.69756097561 943% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22115889417 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0825276342331 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105105809657 0.0843802449381 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152646647417 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120524510046 0.0819641961636 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.