The graph below shows average carbondioxide ( co2) emissions per person in the united kingdom,sweden,itlay and portugal between 1967and 2007.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features,and make comparsions where relevant.
The liner charts reveal that information of represention average carbondioxide emission per person.There are four categories are given like united kingdom, sweeden ,italy and portugal between 1967 and 2007.
Moving a quick glance on the illustration carbondioxide emission per person in 1967 portugal was rose dweller used carbondioxide emission in metric in 11 tonnes. Afterthat, portugal was reduced in 1987 to 2007.
Hence,italy cardondioxide emissions in metric was downfall down in 1967 but it was rose in 1997 to 2007.
On the flip side, itlay carbondioxide emission per person in 1967 to 2007 was same ratio in the chart. Furthermore, sweeden was boomed to carbondioxide emission in 1967 was upsurge average in 8 tonnes. Then, in 1987 to 2007 was declined average to sweden tonnes 5.
To sum up, united kingdom was fall up tonnes in the chart.otherwise, sweeden and portugal was lowest carbondioxide emision in 1987 to 2007 tonnes 5.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 100, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: There
...erage carbondioxide emission per person.There are four categories are given like unit...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 164, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...s are given like united kingdom, sweeden ,italy and portugal between 1967 and 2007...
^^
Line 4, column 6, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , italy
...ugal was reduced in 1987 to 2007. Hence,italy cardondioxide emissions in metric was ...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 12, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...as reduced in 1987 to 2007. Hence,italy cardondioxide emissions in metric was do...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, hence, so, then, well, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 800.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 151.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29801324503 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.50545371207 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15875296208 2.65546596893 119% => OK
Unique words: 78.0 106.607317073 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.516556291391 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 238.5 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.1547301895 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.0 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.875 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 5.23603664747 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245570201463 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135697848909 0.103423049105 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0688458459895 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160741734782 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0775085938936 0.0819641961636 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.