The importance of card less society, has always been debatable, has now upsurged a lot of argument in favor and against it, thus it has become more controversial. The substantial influence of chip card less nation has sparked the controversy over the potential impact of this trend in an integral part of the society in recent years. It can be agreed that upside of not using key card is instrumental indeed, however, it has been some drawbacks as well. This essay will elaborate both assertions and will provide a well weighed conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons how platinum card less society is unreservedly salient, but most conspicuous one lies in the fact that people tend to choose cards over cash as they are easy to carry everywhere. Affinity cards, for instance, light in weight and can stored all cash in only one bank card. Therefore, it is a vital time for people to appreciate the significance of using cards for the overall amelioration of society.
However, there are some people who choose to think differently and hold an opposing view point which can certainly overwhelm the potential influence of simple card. Nevertheless, the contradiction is rooted in the fact that having cash is much easier to use than credit cards as not every inhabitant is educated and familiar with cards. For example, old age people are not habitual of using ATM. Hence, it is apparent the downside of reward cards cannot be overlooked.
The above presented dissertation illustrates both perspectives about the impact of chip cards less nation, while it is evident that it has various benefits, although it's deleterious effects cannot be ignored and have to be well addressed and well balanced against it's merits.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 252, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: light
...erywhere. Affinity cards, for instance, light in weight and can stored all cash in only one ban...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, look, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.5418719212 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1456.0 1207.87684729 121% => OK
No of words: 289.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03806228374 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77334722739 2.71678728327 102% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 139.433497537 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584775086505 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 456.3 379.143842365 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.0538810305 50.4703680194 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.333333333 104.977214359 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0833333333 20.9669160288 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.25397266985 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156660446329 0.242375264174 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0560561037841 0.0925447433944 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0381188716716 0.071462118173 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0929813760738 0.151781067708 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0273101613873 0.0609392437508 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 12.6369458128 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.1260098522 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 11.5310837438 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 55.0591133005 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.