In the modern era, lazy journalism has become commonplace in today's digitalised world. People are suffering from numerous troubles as inappropriate media ruining news' generation life. Inactive news is a debatable issue to resolve for the amelioration of society. In my essay, I will discuss both the definition and causes of inaccurate media affecting the digitalised world.
At the outset, Irresponsible journalism can be defined as a lack of information about the news that they are printing for the country to read. Inappropriate work was done by journalists which shows the involvement of a person was inactive. Journalists, For example, are not really interested to perform their jobs effectively and efficiently. Hence, it is apparently worse consequences for the country.
However, there are a plethora of causes to explain lazy journalism, journalists are more rely on internet sources for collecting the same controversial news to the public for just giving them the entertainment to earn money but not giving the actual thing which could be more useful for peoples'. Journalists, for instance, are more happy to just copy and paste, even they copy images as well to not take the burden for real news.
In the above-presented dissertation illustrates both the definition and causes of irrational journalism in the contemporary world, therefore it has more drawbacks rather than the upsides, it is crystal clear if the journalists would not have a serious attitude towards there work, then in the next coming generation journalism will not be considered and will be rampant easily.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 41, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'explaining'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'cause' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: explaining
...However, there are a plethora of causes to explain lazy journalism, journalists are more r...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, hence, however, if, really, so, then, therefore, well, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 20.9802955665 48% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1352.0 1207.87684729 112% => OK
No of words: 252.0 242.827586207 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36507936508 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13598535265 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595238095238 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 430.2 379.143842365 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 95.1618890311 50.4703680194 189% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.909090909 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9090909091 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.81818181818 7.25397266985 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149860818932 0.242375264174 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0598598315718 0.0925447433944 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0922655807122 0.071462118173 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0925521852368 0.151781067708 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0525231665893 0.0609392437508 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 12.6369458128 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 11.5310837438 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 55.0591133005 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.