The graph below shows the average monthly change in the prices of three metals during 2014 summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the average monthly change in the prices of three metals during 2014.
summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant

The given line graph compares the percentage of the total monthly income which was exchanged by prices of three different elements in 2014.

Overall, it can be deemed that the widely fluctuated while Nickel was decreased rapidly from 6% to 1% at end of the year.

First of all, Copper was dropped slowly from 2% to till above the 0% in January to April which was fell down until over the -1%. In June and it was again raised by 1%which was stayed from July to September then decreased again in October and November but increased slightly by almost 1.5% in December. Moreover, Nickel was dropped surprisingly by 1 %. From 6% In Merch which lived till May then decreased widely with -3% in June. After that, the Time was fluctuated by 1 % cat the end of the year. Therefore, the "Zinc' line was rose sharply by 3% in February and fell down steadily by -1%. In Tune which was continued till October than climbed up rapidly by 21. In December in 2014.

Votes
Average: 1.1 (2 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 193, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n raised by 1%which was stayed from July to September then decreased again in Oct...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, moreover, then, therefore, while, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 786.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.56976744186 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36742547833 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.587209302326 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 230.4 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.8211136326 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.6 112.824112599 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.7 5.23603664747 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0425454697298 0.215688989381 20% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0250938475836 0.103423049105 24% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0524899575543 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0560642851088 0.15604864568 36% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0734657534938 0.0819641961636 90% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 13.2329268293 66% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.93 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.14 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 193, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n raised by 1%which was stayed from July to September then decreased again in Oct...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, moreover, then, therefore, while, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 786.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.56976744186 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36742547833 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.587209302326 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 230.4 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.8211136326 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.6 112.824112599 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.7 5.23603664747 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0425454697298 0.215688989381 20% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0250938475836 0.103423049105 24% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0524899575543 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0560642851088 0.15604864568 36% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0734657534938 0.0819641961636 90% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 13.2329268293 66% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.93 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.14 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.