The graph below shows the change in proportion of GDP in three areas in a particular country between 2000 and 2020

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the change in proportion of GDP in three areas in a particular country between 2000 and 2020.

The line chart demonstrates the GDP rates in three areas including health, education and transportation in a particular country within 2 decades from 2000.

Overall, it is clear that while the proportion of the health sector has increased over the given period, the opposite spectrum could be seen in that of the education one. In addition, there are some significant fluctuations in the GDP rate in the transportation area.

In regards with the health and education area, the GDP rate of Education was 5%, nearly twice higher than that of Health. However, from 2005 to 2015. Despite the rise by 1% in 2005 , the education GDP rate saw a significant drop to below 5% while the percentage of Health doubled, surpassing education’s in 2010, reaching to 6% in 2015. Throughout the remaining period of the time phase, the pattern continue with the rate of health being anticipated to boom to 8% and that of education to decrease to 4% in 2020.

In the Transportation sector, the percentage stood at 3% in 2000, reduced by 1% in 2005 then bounced back to 4% in 2010 and is predicted to observe a decline to approximately 3.5% in 2020.

Votes
Average: 10 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 181, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... to 2015. Despite the rise by 1% in 2005 , the education GDP rate saw a significan...
^^
Line 5, column 241, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... rate saw a significant drop to below 5% while the percentage of Health doubled, ...
^^
Line 7, column 30, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n 2020. In the Transportation sector, the percentage stood at 3% in 2000, redu...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, then, while, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 947.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83163265306 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99179049718 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561224489796 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.1360282671 43.030603864 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.375 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.125 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178656695869 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0806690375972 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0729382427588 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124688013286 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0760837000445 0.0819641961636 93% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.