Some people believe that if a police force carries guns, this encourages higher level of violence int hat society. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
In recent decades, gun ownership in police has been attracting a great deal of media attention due to its substantial impacts on civilians' life. I partially agree with the proposal that police carrying guns incentivize higher level of violence in that society.
On the one hand, there are a multitude of problems associated with violence when it comes to gun ownership in police. First, police officers have a propensity to commit a unpremeditated murder. This means that police with brutal and aggressive nature are more likely to shoot residents instead of detaining them even though they just commit petty crimes. Besides, decadent police could use guns to easily commit felonies. For instance, some police officers are implicated in sexual attack or extortion and utilise guns to hinder victims from any intention of accusation.
On the other hand,gun ownership in police is not without advantages. First, Gun is the most efficient and inexpensive weapon for police to control the prevalence of crime in the local area. It is implied that criminals would think twice if they see police with pistols due to their fear of shooting as punishment. In addition, Gun ownership in police is invariably associated with a decrease in any intents of violent attack and even murder towards them from senseless criminals. In fact, many female police officers worldwide are susceptible to rape and even human trafficking due to having no weapon for self-defense.
In conclusion, I believe that police carrying guns could culminate in positive and negative effects on equal measure. By acknowledging these problems, the government as well as police themselves could find a solution to dodge them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 130, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'civilians'' or 'civilian's'?
Suggestion: civilians'; civilian's
...ntion due to its substantial impacts on civilians life. I partially agree with the propos...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 170, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ce officers have a propensity to commit a unpremeditated murder. This means that ...
^
Line 5, column 18, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , gun
...tion of accusation. On the other hand,gun ownership in police is not without adva...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...o having no weapon for self-defense. In conclusion, I believe that police carry...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, if, so, well, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1427.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26568265683 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82031815998 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59778597786 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.571762348 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.928571429 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3571428571 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85714285714 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169864110684 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0660147411887 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0696224210321 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114210477612 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0441464921377 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.