Some people believe that if a police force carries guns, this encourages higher level of violence int hat society. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

It is true that the security of society in some parts of the world is alarming. This puts the governments' officials under the pressure to looking for the main causes and bringing up feasible to prevent the problem from further exacerbated. Some inhabitants argue that this case appears because the guns are always used by a police to solve a criminal act. I personally tend to disagree with this notion, while i opine that there are more important reasons behind this vexing issue.
One reason to support my view is that a police holds a responsibility to tackle of violence in the urban or suburban areas using a gun. An obvious example of this happens in The United State, a man killed more than ten people in the cinema using a weapon, while a police shot in the foot to paralyze him. Obviously, police officers can force a criminal to surrender, because they have a weapon which will prevent an escaping criminal who poses a serious danger to the public. In addition, there are 2 major factors in terms of reasons which make the level of violence be on the rise. The first and foremost reason is subjective to parents' neglect or inappropriate child- raising ways. Most of the parents nowadays virtually devote their whole of time to work in order to ensure material well- being, which means that they may spend less time to take care of their children. Without their supervision, children can may friends with malevolent friends outside and then become depressed and anti- social youngsters. Therefore, parents should equip themselves with specific knowledge and skills to provide proper and adequate childcare which are deemed to be the key of youth violence increase. Moreover, the growing rate of the unemployment causes higher property and violent crime rates. They yield that unemployment triggers participation in insurgencies, prompts people to joint violent gangs, drive people to extremism and that is the primary cause behind domestic violence.
In conclusion, based on the aforementioned discussions, one may conclude that the practice of police bringing their guns with them is not the main culprit of violent growth. The accelerating rate of violence should be ascribed to the combination of parental care and the rising popularity of unemployment.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 411, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...end to disagree with this notion, while i opine that there are more important rea...
^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, may, moreover, so, then, therefore, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, it is true

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1893.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 375.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.048 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74006196199 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 598.5 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.1778437003 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.3125 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4375 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 3.9879759519 326% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180334837329 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.053565916636 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0414165237195 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119993162149 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0526402351502 0.056905535591 93% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.