The graph below shows the changes in maximum number of Asian elephants between 1994 and 2007
A glance to bar chart below provides reveals about the differences of majority of Asian elephants during 13 years.
Clearly it is evident that the india have the maximum population of asia elephants the highest amount of 10000 elephants in 1997. However, the china have the minimum rate of 1000 animals in the same year.
The Myanmar were the second habitat of asia elephants with amount of 5000 after india. although india were the country whose elephant population sharply fallen about 2300 animals between 1997 and 2004. Beside that Thailand and Malaysia are the next countries who observed this extinction with amount of 2000 animals in the same period. it is considerable that Laos elephants crowd didn’t face any changes in their population.
Vietnam changes during 1997 and 2004 provided a negligible amount of extinction less than 100 animals. although, Sri Lanka and china have the same pattern of Vietnam chart with decline number of approximately 200 animals, the Cambodia increase its asia elephant about 100 from 1997 to 2004.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 88, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Although
...phants with amount of 5000 after india. although india were the country whose elephant p...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 338, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...nt of 2000 animals in the same period. it is considerable that Laos elephants cro...
^^
Line 13, column 104, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Although
...nt of extinction less than 100 animals. although, Sri Lanka and china have the same patt...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 890.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23529411765 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48424795245 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.3360912892 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.8888888889 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8888888889 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.11111111111 5.23603664747 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167490329321 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0687735524784 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.04858002221 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103086240909 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0238362479519 0.0819641961636 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.