New stories on TV and in newspapers are very often accompanied by pictures.
Some people say that these pictures are more effective than words.
What is your opinion about this?
some people believe that illustrations are more efficient than sentences to demonstrate tv news and newspaper stories. I agree with the opinion given, because pictures will benefit both tv stories and newspapers creators and audiences.
A good reason that news and stories should accompanied by pictures rather than just words is that, firstly, pictures act as a title and even more impressive to share the feeling of the headline. For example, in euro cup champions a poor football team has won the cup. Undoubtedly, if there be a picture from head-above cup and their face while they are thrilled would present currently the feeling of them with the audiences or readers. Furthermore, sometimes some people haven’t enough time to spend for entire news or stories, thus, pictures provide the main aim of them.
Another reason that pictures are next to words in TV series and newspapers is that in terms of attracting audiences, from a glance look pictures are attractive to persuade. In the other word, the shows and news which have a wider picture are sold easier in comparison with the news which are solo with sentences. For instance, a colorful picture in a newspaper from a ceremony in Mexico which is called ‘The Death Day’ will absolutely pull the readers to buy the newspaper.
In conclusion, some people prefer to follow stories and news which are surrounded with pictures since they are more effective than words. I agree with the pictures for the benefits it provide for both editors and audiences.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Some
some people believe that illustrations are m...
^^^^
Line 13, column 185, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'provides'?
Suggestion: provides
...e with the pictures for the benefits it provide for both editors and audiences.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, look, so, thus, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1288.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09090909091 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70038877729 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.557312252964 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 396.0 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.0211141021 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.090909091 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.72727272727 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237876949575 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101647453218 0.084324248473 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0842927599311 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173474357252 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0711335184234 0.056905535591 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.