News stories on TV and in newspaper are very often accompanied by pictures. Some people say that these pictures are more effective than words.
What is your opinion about this?
Nowadays, with rapid growth of technology, news is shared anywhere at least time and everybody can follow the news in all the world. The manner of newscast is different, some people believe that watching or reading news with pictures are more effective while others think that words can bring their meaning alone and do not need to share with images. This essay will shed some light on this argument from both sides and extend my partial support to the former view before arriving at conclusion.
Texts never can encourage people to follow and read news completely. Adding images or short clips can make news understandable and due to pictures people will persuaded to read them fully. Without pictures newspaper or TV programs are terrible and the eyes of readers will get tired if they just see words or speaker’s face. Watching news moreover, without any pictures is like listening to the radio or podcasts and it will be unprofitable if we watch TV for news. Sometimes in some news broadcast they just show the short clips or some pictures and they write on it “no comment”. It means that, pictures can bring messages and do not need to explain. For instance: when they want to show something about destruction owing to earthquake or any other natural disasters, they just show pictures or short movies and it is obvious that the effect of these kinds of news are more than when speakers want to explain. According to exporter’s researches, combination of news with media is more effective in individual's mind. In my opinion, journals or gazette with attractive and flashy pictures on their first page on the counter of stores are selling more.
On the other hands, some people think that when they show images or short film along the news, they really disarranged the concentration of watcher and they forgot the main subjects. Environmentalists moreover, follow this issue on their point of view. They believe that, if journalists use lots of pictures for explaining their news, they waste more paper and even color, in reality they danger the nature unawareness. Consequently, paper producer should cut more trees and finally they destroyed the environment, thus they are the fans of news without pictures because on this way less papers are using. For gathering pictures or making clips furthermore, producers need to spend more money and they think it is wasting the money and time, because news is just for listening during the day and do not need to pot these kinds of budget on them. In addition, not only showing the images or short movies about some sadness news have a destructive direct effect on individuals feeling, but also it can increase the rate of harshness and crime among citizenry. For example: when they show the scene of war or battle or even to arrest of criminals, people specially children see them and for them these kinds of activity are exciting and they want to do them in reality, so the rate of rudeness will rise in society.
At the conclusion, in my front of view, news without pictures are nothing, and images can illustrate the effect of news. My experience shows pictures can speak more than words and they can change the world in silence.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 160, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'persuade'
Suggestion: persuade
...andable and due to pictures people will persuaded to read them fully. Without pictures ne...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, first, furthermore, if, moreover, really, so, thus, while, at least, for example, for instance, in addition, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 7.85571142285 242% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 37.0 10.4138276553 355% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 24.0651302605 208% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 73.0 41.998997996 174% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2675.0 1615.20841683 166% => OK
No of words: 545.0 315.596192385 173% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90825688073 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.83169070408 4.20363070211 115% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61110910342 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 255.0 176.041082164 145% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.467889908257 0.561755894193 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 814.5 506.74238477 161% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.1608701768 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.380952381 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9523809524 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236377520912 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0838961227618 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0282732197032 0.0667982634062 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162940541103 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0406273613188 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.