News stories on TV and in newspapers are very often accompanied by pictures. Some people say that these pictures are more effective than words.
What is your opinion about this?
Over the years, there has been a tremendous development in the methods of delivering news to public. Whether through TV, newspapers and internet. News stories are very often accompanied by pictures, yet there has been a debate between people, about the effectiveness of pictures over words. This essay will discuss both views.
Some people prefer to hear about the news through pictures and videos. From their point of view, pictures can show the facts and news in a clearer way, not to mention also in an extremely fast approach. They support their idea by the fact that we live in an extremely fast paced era. Thus, we no longer have enough time to waste over reading many lines in newspapers to know whats happening around us, while in the same time, a series of pictures can deliver the whole story in couple of seconds.
However, other people think differently, they are desperate about losing the words in the news. In their belief, pictures can never deliver the whole story. Moreover, pictures can be misleading. I stand by this point of view, as many newspapers aim to increase their selling's rate by using fake pictures just to grab the attention. In addition to relying on some similar previous occasions' pictures when not having new ones. Thus depending only on the pictures without reading the details of the story, will surely lead to miss-understanding.
As a conclusion, using pictures in the news stories is a good way to supplement the words and develop the image of the story, nevertheless, they will never be more effective than words. Not mention, pictures alone will never be a reliable source for the news.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 376, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: what's
...eading many lines in newspapers to know whats happening around us, while in the same ...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 399, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...some similar previous occasions pictures when not having new ones. Thus depending...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, so, thus, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1367.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91726618705 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62181854991 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.568345323741 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 419.4 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.5448029565 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.4375 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.375 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.9375 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.322770607945 0.244688304435 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0988606382364 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0896451339582 0.0667982634062 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19527959924 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0661798368983 0.056905535591 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.96 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.