The graphe below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph demonstrates the amount of fish and some various types of meat which had consumed in some European country during 40 years.
From a simple recognition to the provided information, it is apparent chicken was the most kind of meat that a person used per week. While, minimum portion a person used to use belong to fish.
In 1979, beef was the most popular kind of meat because it used to be eaten 220 grams per person in a week, although, chicken and lamp were eaten is a similar portion by approximately 150 grams by a person in the same time. Also, fish were just a negligible proportion of meals in a week by 50 grams in a week.
it is considerable that in 2004, both beef and lamb amounts in people’s diet declined dramatically, beef usage fell to 110 grams in a week and lamb decreased to mere 60 grams per person in one week. Besides that, it is noticeable that chicken proportion rose particularly from 1989 to 2004.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 134, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...nd of meat that a person used per week. While, minimum portion a person used to use b...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...s in a week by 50 grams in a week. it is considerable that in 2004, both bee...
^^
Line 13, column 33, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...k. it is considerable that in 2004, both beef and lamb amounts in people&apo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, so, while, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 785.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.56395348837 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6727687024 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546511627907 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 234.9 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.8399112438 43.030603864 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.142857143 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5714285714 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.71428571429 5.23603664747 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119175342508 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0604069154975 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0567643561209 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0859787267905 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0643946045165 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.