The graph below shows the changes in UK birth rate of women in 6 different age groups from 1973 to 2008.
The line graph illustrates the rate of birth for females in 6 different age group in the UK over the course of 25 years, starting from 1973.
In general, it is evident from the chart that while the birth rates in 20 - 25 group, 30 - 35 group and under 20 group decreased, the opposites were true for other groups. In addition, the birth rate for females in 25 - 29 group was highest and the rate in over 40 group was lowest over the period.
With regards to the rate of birth for women between 25 and 29 years old, it began at 140 per 1000 people in 1973 and then fluctuated from approximately 115 to 140 per 1000 individuals between 1973 and 2008. The period from 1973 to 2008 saw a fall between over 120 and 90 per 1000 residents in the birth rate for women aged 20 to 25. Similarly, the rate of birth given by females aged under 20 and over 40 were 60 and under 20 per 1000 residents respectively in 1973 and then these figures declined to 40 and somewhere in the vicinity of 15 per 1000 people in that order in 2008.
Meanwhile, starting at approximately 70 per 1000 individuals in 1973, there was a gradual climb to 85 per 1000 people in the birth rate for those who were in the 30-35 group. Likewise, the rate of birth given by women who were from 35 to 39 years old increased steadily from 40 to roughly 42 per 1000 people between 1973 and 1988, before experiencing a considerable rise to approximately 65 per 1000 individuals in 2008.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 272, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'was the lowest'.
Suggestion: was the lowest
...s highest and the rate in over 40 group was lowest over the period. With regards to the...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 113, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... it began at 140 per 1000 people in 1973 and then fluctuated from approximately 1...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, similarly, so, then, while, in addition, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 33.7804878049 166% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1179.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 272.0 196.424390244 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.33455882353 4.92477711251 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45663210968 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.426470588235 0.547539520022 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 324.9 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 34.0 22.4926829268 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.8678468538 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.375 112.824112599 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.0 22.9334400587 148% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.125 5.23603664747 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.33865537709 0.215688989381 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.198284812157 0.103423049105 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0885392355548 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.254720170662 0.15604864568 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0863854293799 0.0819641961636 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.81 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.43 11.4140731707 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.12 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.9970731707 142% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.