The graph below shows changes in young adult unemployment rates in England between 1993 and 2012.
The line graph illustrates the percentage of unemployed people who lived in England and aged 16-24 over a period of 20 years from 1993 to 2012.
Overall, It is obvious that, the proportion of young people who were jobless was considerably higher than the proportion of adults not being out of work. In addition, , unemployment rates of young people and adults in London were higher than in the rest of England.
In 1993, While unemployment rate of young people living in the rest of England was around 17%, the figure for those living in the capital of England was higher approximately 5%, at 22%. In addition, the proportion of adults who were unemployed in London was around 14%. However, the percentage of jobless adults outside England was lower around 4%, at 10%. In the next 10 years, levels of joblessness fell considerably in London and in the rest of England.
From 2002 to 2012, the unemployed percentage of young people outside London rose sharply around 9%, from 12% to 21%. Whereas, the jobless proportion of young people in the capital of England increased significantly around 10%, from 15% to a peak of 25%. On the contrary, the jobless proportion of adults both in London and in the rest of England were below 10%, around 9% and 8% respectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 168, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ults not being out of work. In addition, , unemployment rates of young people and ...
^^
Line 5, column 188, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...nd was higher approximately 5%, at 22%. In addition, the proportion of adults who...
^^
Line 5, column 218, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., at 22%. In addition, the proportion of adults who were unemployed in London was...
^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in London and in the rest of England. From 2002 to 2012, the unemployed percen...
^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ow 10%, around 9% and 8% respectively.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, whereas, while, in addition, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 33.7804878049 166% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1058.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85321100917 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6984562909 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.440366972477 0.547539520022 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 299.7 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 3.36585365854 327% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.2537600969 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.8 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.7 5.23603664747 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27976008199 0.215688989381 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131858077482 0.103423049105 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0653025197477 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188770713486 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0127675915255 0.0819641961636 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.85 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.