The graph below shows the changing patterns of access to modern technology in homes in the UK (expresses in percentage terms).
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph demonstrates in percentage terms four approaches to modern technology in homes over a 14-year period from 1994.
As an overall trend, these patterns experienced increases in the percentage of use, and the most significant rise happened to DVD player.
In the period from 2002 to 2003, DVD player became known to people, but it was the least popular among all with about 30 percent of British using it at home. After that, the percentage of DVD player underwent a surge of well over 50 percent and passed Internet and mobile phone’s access percentage between 2006 and 2007. It then kept increasing to reach approximately 90 percent in 2008, and DVD player turned out to be the most common approach to modern technology.
The other patterns, on the contrary, did not witness a notable short-time change as that of DVD player. CD player’s proportion rose from about 48 percent to around 88 percent in 2004 and remained steady during the rest of the time. Mobile phone followed the same pattern and reached nearly 80 percent of being used at home in 2008. In terms of Internet connection percentage, it went up over the period from 1998 and reached its all-time high at about 65 percent in 2008.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, then, well, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1019.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87559808612 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65418735489 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612440191388 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 287.1 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.1525908287 43.030603864 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 113.222222222 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2222222222 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110186266177 0.215688989381 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0536044501352 0.103423049105 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0519720725648 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0886388780802 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.057631979059 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.