The graph shows predictions about the number of people who will study three major world languages between 2020 and 2030.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The graph illustrates estimations about how many people will study three common world languages, over a decade from 2020 to 2030.
Overall, what stands out from the graph is that there are upward trends in the number of linguistic learners for three languages. Another interesting point is that the figure for English is likely to overwhelm those of the others over the span of time in question.
Looking at details, as regards Spanish, the number starts at well over 200 millions. Right after that, the year 2022 will undergo a significant rise, soaring to around 290 millions. Subsequently, there will be a negligible growth to reach 300 millions in 2024. However, at this point, Mandarin will be going up dramatically, rocketing to just over 290 millions, nearly reaching the number of Spanish students. By the year 2030, the number students learning Mandarin will have overtaken Spanish's. The figures are 560 millions and about 500 millions respectively.
In addition, the number of English students also follow the same increasing pattern. During the first 4 years of the period, it will surge by just under 160 millions. Despite falling sharply to approximately 640 millions in 2026, it will soon recover and then shoot up to reach the peak of the whole period which is around 740 millions.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, look, so, then, well, as regards, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 1.00243902439 698% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1091.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07441860465 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63423399695 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 106.607317073 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627906976744 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 303.3 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.114634146341 872% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.8403133709 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.9166666667 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9166666667 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.91666666667 5.23603664747 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160348259718 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0598422272194 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0679564131503 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114893395819 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0889927740485 0.0819641961636 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.