The graph below shows the consumption of 3 spreads from 1981 to 2007
The line graph illustrates the intake of three different types of spread over the period of 26 years ranging from 1981 to 2007. Intake was measured in Grams.
Overall, the consumption of Butter and Margarine declined steadily whereas the adoption of Lowfat & reduced spreads increased (after being absent till 1996). In the year 2007, the quantity of almost all the types of spreads consumed was around 40-70 Grams. However, in the beginning there was a huge gap of about 70 Grams between Margarine and Butter.
The consumption of Margarine and Butter declined almost steadily over the time period. Consumption of Butter, in the beginning, observed a gradual increase from 140 Grams to 160 Grams till 1986 and then dropped drastically till 1991 extending further with a steady decrease till around 50 Grams in 2007. Margarine, on the other side, observed some fluctuations. In 1981, the consumption of Margarine was at 90 Grams, which decreased to 80 Grams in 1986 and then further topping at 100 Grams in 1991. It further remained constant till 1996 and then decreased gradually.
Till 1996, the consumption of Low fat & reduced spreads remained absent. On the contrary, this absence till 1996, it gained a momentum which increased the consumption to 80 Grams and further decreased steadily until it reached around 70 Grams.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 190, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... 1996. In the year 2007, the quantity of almost all the types of spreads consumed...
^^
Line 5, column 478, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...0 Grams in 1986 and then further topping at 100 Grams in 1991. It further remaine...
^^
Line 7, column 117, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the contrary, this absence till 1996, it gained a momentum which increased the co...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, then, whereas, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1114.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.133640553 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62824164331 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520737327189 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 304.2 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.3003140558 43.030603864 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.8333333333 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0833333333 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201138924769 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0763375381008 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0800060963163 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14154837777 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0590840180931 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.