The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The usage of fish, chicken, beef, and lamb in a country in Europe during the 1979-2004 period has been demonstrated in the line graph above.
The first impression is that while chicken consumption witnessed an overall upward trend, that of the others decreased over time. Secondly, fish usage was not much of a big fluctuation among all.
In particular, this European nation had its chicken figure change go up and down continuously. In spite of that, the highest number of 250 grams per person per week occurred in 2004 which was the end and the lowest point 140 grams was seen in 1979 which was the beginning of the analyzed period.
Similarly, beef and lamb’s numbers share that same sudden direction-changing tendency except that these two meet types decreased in general. There was a sharp drop in 1981 to 175 grams from 220 grams in the figure of beef usage. Followed that was an even more dramatic rise to 240 grams in 1982. As far as the lamb was concerned, its number almost remained the same from 1982 to 1985. As pointed out earlier, the consumption of fish did not fall sharply. The difference in grams between 1999 to 2004 was very subtly which was around 40 grams.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, secondly, similarly, so, while, in general, in particular, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 984.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73076923077 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53290110698 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629807692308 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.0646172292 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.4545454545 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9090909091 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.09090909091 5.23603664747 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0891947596965 0.215688989381 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0371102839005 0.103423049105 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0413097019785 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.066553424666 0.15604864568 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0402639756567 0.0819641961636 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.41 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, secondly, similarly, so, while, in general, in particular, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 984.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73076923077 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53290110698 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629807692308 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.0646172292 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.4545454545 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9090909091 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.09090909091 5.23603664747 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0891947596965 0.215688989381 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0371102839005 0.103423049105 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0413097019785 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.066553424666 0.15604864568 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0402639756567 0.0819641961636 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.41 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.