The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in European countries in 1979 to 2004.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting main features and make comparision where relevant.
Line chart is statistical representation of variability in consumption of Non vegetarian food in European countries in 1979 to 2004.
At a glance it is observed that striking factor being the trend of overall variations in consumption of non vegetarian food.
On statically analyses, more than 200 grams beef ate per person per week in 1979.whereas, consumption of chicken and lamb has bleak difference in1979. In same year, 150 grams lamb ate by per person per week and 140 grams chicken ate by per person per week. Shockingly, table turns afte 1989 chicken supersed the beef upto 2004 at apex 250 grams chicken ate by per person per week in 2004. Interestingly, consumption of fish was approximately stable no more than 100 grams ate by per person upto 2004. Moreover, overall fluctuation was seems in consumption of beef and dramatic fall in beaf .wheareas, more than 60 grams of lamb ate by per person per week in 1994.
In the nutsell, overall flucation were seems in all the non vegetarian food iteams . Aparr from that, oveall dramatic fall were also seems in all the three food items except from consumption of chicken .
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 104, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of overall variations in consumption of non vegetarian food. On statically an...
^^
Line 5, column 590, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...mption of beef and dramatic fall in beaf .wheareas, more than 60 grams of lamb at...
^^
Line 5, column 601, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eef and dramatic fall in beaf .wheareas, more than 60 grams of lamb ate by per pe...
^^
Line 7, column 83, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ms in all the non vegetarian food iteams . Aparr from that, oveall dramatic fall w...
^^
Line 7, column 202, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...items except from consumption of chicken .
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, moreover, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 944.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91666666667 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83075588338 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505208333333 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.3009715782 43.030603864 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 104.888888889 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.44444444444 5.23603664747 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0858205954009 0.215688989381 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0512115903058 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0524673825808 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0699668778073 0.15604864568 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0628709542688 0.0819641961636 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.23 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.