The given graph illustrates the amount of fish and other meat that consumes in Europe between 1979 to 2004.There were 4 kinds of meat that European had eaten during 25 years, consist of chicken, beef, lamb and fish.
At the beginning, beef was the most popular food, an average person consumed it around 200 grams per week. However, the consumption significantly decreased continuously until 2004, the consumption had dropped to second place of the table. Besides, lamp had been sharing the same trend as beef, only the consumption was lower than beef around 20% in 25 years period.
On the other hand, chicken was not much popular in 1979, only 150 grams of chicken per week were used for food on 1979. Later on, the consumption of chicken slightly increased every 5 years until 1990s, chicken became the most common daily food with around 200 grams per week. As well, it had increased their popularity continuously until 2004. Whereas, fish consumption was not much change in 25 years, an average of fish consumption was only around 50 grams. So that, fish were the latest choice among these meats.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 108, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: There
...consumes in Europe between 1979 to 2004.There were 4 kinds of meat that European had ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, second, so, well, whereas, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 921.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89893617021 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44353967588 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590425531915 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.3757802922 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.333333333 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8888888889 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 5.23603664747 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150621213808 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0661626344449 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0673008218802 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127855279859 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0781579582923 0.0819641961636 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.98 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.