Opinions are divided as to whether punishment is vital for children to realize an ethics. In my opinion, physical punishment may not be the right approach in order to teach children the right way.
In very early stage of childhood, babies cannot perceive the consequence of their actions and mistakes are found often in any activities. The reason of this is, children are too young so that they have different perception from us who are adult. Mammals raise their infants by teaching fundamental things like what to eat and where should not go but everything. Later on, development should be progressed by self-learning for example, tiger is a dangerous specie by seeing their friends be killed. However, it is unacceptable for human to take that risk, so we have an education system for assisting our children in the appropriate way.
Studying in school will teach our pupils from early stage until advanced stage. Furthermore, punishment is one of the tools to give warning when children are misleading. However, physical penalties are always found such as hitting. To hit children might not change their behavior permanently, whatever kids do, they think of it as if pleasure, later on they will always avoid not to catch when they have inappropriate actions. For instance, burglars know very well their action may lead them into a jail but they keep doing that by try not to be caught by police. So, giving reasons when they are young is the best to fix these stubborn children. Yong people will not break prohibition if they know the result of the action very well.
In conclusion, well reason is the best tool for teaching our kids since they understand a consequence of their actions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 22, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
Opinions are divided as to whether punishment is vital for children to rea...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, may, so, well, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1414.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92682926829 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66556671378 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574912891986 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 419.4 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.1658203688 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.2666666667 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1333333333 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180955051682 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0613147069276 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0549325173268 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117052053945 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0800230639404 0.056905535591 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.