Opinion are divided as to whether the only way to control household recycling is using law or not. In my opinion, I agree with the idea of making it legally but many households still have less knowledge about recycling especially consumer electronic devices.
Nowadays, many materials we left behind affected a lot to our world and other species for example plastic bags are often found under the sea, causing of death in many species like turtles and dolphins due to it looks similar to a jellyfish. Moreover, these kinds of wastes could not be decayed by themselves so spreading out a civilization will affect our nature directly. Therefore, only people’ consciousness is not enough to stop the issue. In addition, there are many people who does not care about other life, they only think of themselves to be comfortable by not doing recycle. Consequently, our governments are paid money immensely to recover nature which is not preventing but fixing.
To prevent these issues, government should make it as a law that every households have to separate their waste before throwing them outside their house. In Korea, cost of collecting garbage is expensive and also penalty is far beyond that. People are forced to buy a specific bag that suits to their waste like a green bag for food waste and a red bag for plastic waste. However, people also have too less information about recycling, many materials are needed specific process to eliminate like Li-on battery. Therefore, government should enlighten their people as much as they can, and teaching them in a school program as a core subject.
In conclusion, our wastes affect to our nature which need to be fixed. With government’s power, they are able to force people by using a law and also need to give as many as knowledge about recycling and consequences.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 21, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
Opinion are divided as to whether the only way to control household recyc...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, look, moreover, so, still, therefore, as to, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1529.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98045602606 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7600553908 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57003257329 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4967419424 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.214285714 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9285714286 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.78571428571 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287073266545 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0941426773468 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0567001987315 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169123244936 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0370411587936 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.