Opinions are divided as to whether troublesome school students should be separated from other students. In my opinion, it would be definitely make the matters worse if the student are isolated.
Imaging picture in a prison, grouping trouble people together will cause of even more trouble because these prisoners always conspire together for prison's rules. Their reaction is as if they are a rebel and rule is definitely wrong. If we use this principle to children in school. The consequence is, children will be very difficult to control. Moreover, kids' development affects mainly from their friend both positive and negative habits. Because in any ecosystem, humans always learn characteristics from other, they copy what they see from each other, it will be even worse if the model is stubborn students. Nevertheless, teachers are just ordinary people. They have emotions, needs, hates and etc. When teachers assign to teach specific group of children especially a trouble group, teachers will lack of motivation to teach these people. Finally, these students may not be taught properly.
On the other way, if troublesome children are followed by the right way and sending them into a proper ecosystem. There has been a lot of evidences in many schools, at some age, having a good grade is what people admire. So that it is more likely that they will turn back to be normal when they grow up in the future.
In conclusion, I believe that things would get worse if difficult students are isolated from other students.
- The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- The Charts summarise the weight measurement of people living in Charlestown in 1955 and 2015. 61
- Disruptive school students have a negative influence on others. Students who are noisy and disobedient should be grouped together and taught separately.Do you agree or disagree? 61
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use. Summarise the information below by selecting and reporting the main features, and mak 78
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 22, Rule ID: WHETHER
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Opinions are divided as to whether troublesome school students should be s...
Line 3, column 234, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e a rebel and rule is definitely wrong. If we use this principle to children in sc...
Line 3, column 695, Rule ID: AND_ETC
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
...eople. They have emotions, needs, hates and etc. When teachers assign to teach specific ...
Line 5, column 222, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT
Message: “So that” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ing a good grade is what people admire. So that it is more likely that they will turn b...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, as to, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1279.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 252.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0753968254 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62988079401 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.611111111111 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 396.9 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.6202970438 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.9375 106.682146367 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.75 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0625 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164385507731 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0559020220917 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0564195114854 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103048546241 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0601451607866 0.056905535591 106% => OK
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.