The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The bar graphs demonstrate the difference of ex-full-time jobs between undergraduate and postgraduate students in UK
after graduated in 2008. Looking more closely to the table, it can be clearly seen that the trend of both education
levels are similar in many elements.

According to the table, undergraduate students went for further study at 29,665 people where this is marjority
choice among other options. It was followed by part-time work and unemployment as the number was not significant
difference, 17,735 and 16,235 respectively. Interesingly, people who decided to work as volunteer was the lowest,
the number of voluntary work was only 3,500.

Postgraduate student also prefered for further study at 2,725 people. However, the wide between higher study and
working as a part-time job tend to be shortened as part-time work was 2,535 people. Unemployment were still in
third place similar to undergraduates, 1,625 people. Again, only 345 people worked for voluntary work.

In conclusion, the trend between these education levels are indifferent in term of proportion.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 117, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...graduate and postgraduate students in UK after graduated in 2008. Looking more cl...
^^^
Line 2, column 116, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ly seen that the trend of both education levels are similar in many elements. ...
^^^
Line 6, column 113, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oyment as the number was not significant difference, 17,735 and 16,235 respective...
^^^
Line 7, column 114, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ded to work as volunteer was the lowest, the number of voluntary work was only 3,...
^^^
Line 10, column 113, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...wever, the wide between higher study and working as a part-time job tend to be sh...
^^^
Line 11, column 111, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...2,535 people. Unemployment were still in third place similar to undergraduates, 1...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, so, still, third, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 934.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.59281437126 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06133881357 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622754491018 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.8246654483 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.4 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 11.0 3.83414634146 287% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146723725734 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0583206721853 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0612527235175 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0533088177614 0.15604864568 34% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0379279624665 0.0819641961636 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 11.4140731707 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.