The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000.

The table compares average length of travelling by various modes of transport in England from 1985 to 2000. Looking more closely to the table, it can be clearly seen that there is a considerable increase in most options.

According to the table, the usage of car, long distance bus, train, taxi and other rose relatively in 10-year period. Moreover, the most popular method of travelling was still a car at around 70% of total. It is followed by a significant decrease in using local bus from 429 miles in 1985 to 275 miles in 2000. However, walking and bicycle number remained stable during 15 years, less than 20 miles had changed for those transportation. Furthermore, the least appreciation in 1985 was taxi where bicycle became the lowest mode instead in 2000. Anyway, people in England tend to travel longer distance from 4,740 miles in 1985 to 6,475 miles in 2000.

In conclusion, people in England travel has longer distance of travel in 2000, and people favor using car.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 417, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this transportation' or 'those transportations'?
Suggestion: this transportation; those transportations
...ars, less than 20 miles had changed for those transportation. Furthermore, the least appreciation in...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 487, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'taxied'.
Suggestion: taxied
...ore, the least appreciation in 1985 was taxi where bicycle became the lowest mode in...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
anyway, furthermore, however, if, look, moreover, still, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 820.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88095238095 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55259305267 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619047619048 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 239.4 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 9.77525219908 43.030603864 23% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.1111111111 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.77777777778 5.23603664747 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256538004276 0.215688989381 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108770924718 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102434010019 0.0843802449381 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187281463045 0.15604864568 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0234045941398 0.0819641961636 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.