The bar graph compares the telephone usages in UK by three difference methods between 1995 and 2002.
There was a fluctuating trend in Local - fixed line usage from 1995 to 2002, starting from 70 billion minutes, finishing at around 72 billion minutes. Furthermore, it reached the peak of 90 billion minutes in 1999. After that, the popularity dropped gradually from 2000 to 2002.
In contrast, both usages of National and international – fixed line and those of Mobile rose sharply over 7 year-period. Looking at National and international calls, there was a gradual increase from about 40 billion minutes in 1995 to under 60 billion minutes in 2002, almost standing at the most popular method in UK in 2002. While, Mobile starting at low level, it showed a dramatic rise from low level (approximately 3 billion minutes) to over 40 billion minutes in 2002.
To sum up, after 1999, Local – fixed line decreased its popularity, while National and international – fixed line increased significantly.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, look, while, in contrast, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 847.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13333333333 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83156240996 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575757575758 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 249.3 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9817671396 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.875 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.625 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172730714106 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0869540701047 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103207858512 0.0843802449381 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13249498937 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116055092554 0.0819641961636 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.