Opinions are divided whether Internet-based courses are more effective than university-based courses. Despite the fact that there are some benefits of taking Internet-based courses, I believe that both ways are useful as long as people use them correctly.
Students have been studied in Universities for more than centuries, there are a lot of benefits by doing so. First, many courses require to have a special equipment for doing experiments. For example, Chemistry and Biology. Those particular stuffs sometimes cannot be found easily in ordinary store whereas studying in university provides you all those necessary things for learning. Moreover, learning in universities are 2-way communication which pupils' and professors' discussion are always required. This is very powerful because each person idea may not be correct yet but combining theories together always result in better outcome. Lastly, On the job practices are really important for human perception when people are studying classroom, it is similar to a real situation because they will have experiments, demonstrations and trainings. These help students to understand clearly from what professors pass on them.
On the other hand, Internet-based courses have some advantages especially specific field, like language study and lecture class. First, there is a common problem when we live in a metropolis which is traffic issue. However, studying on the internet eliminates the problem completely. These days, we can access to the internet from everywhere and by many devices even when we are in a bathroom so we can study from anywhere. As mentioned earlier about tele-studying, we also can be more flexible in term of time. Studying on the internet can be chosen whenever time you prefer, we also can pause when busy and repeat when we do not understand it. Internet-based courses is useful as long as we have a good discipline on studying.
In conclusion, both methods of studying are beneficial to learners depending how well we use it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 146, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'special equipment'.
Suggestion: special equipment
...so. First, many courses require to have a special equipment for doing experiments. For example, Che...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, lastly, may, moreover, really, so, well, whereas, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1701.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36593059937 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02105117328 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596214511041 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 545.4 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.147867829 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.5 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6111111111 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279930511732 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0863216722285 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0661088904067 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154418774167 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0667506217701 0.056905535591 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.57 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.