The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.

The picture compares the amount of goods carrying by various type of transportation in UK from 1974 to 2002. Looking more closely at the graph, it can be clearly seen that there is a noticeable discrepancy in using shipping by each method.

According to the figure, road was the most popular transportation during all 28-year period. Also, there was a gradual increase from 70 million tonnes in 1974 to almost 100 tonnes in 2002. On the other hand, carrying goods by pipeline was the minority choice, with less than 20 million tonnes until 1994, it had a small increase to 22 million tonnes per year. However, the rest methods of transport were stayed at the middle of the table and there are a fluctuating trend during 28 years. Anyway, the gap between these were approximately 20 million tonnes.

In conclusion, there are a significant difference in the amount of shipping by each transportation.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 467, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'trends'?
Suggestion: trends
...f the table and there are a fluctuating trend during 28 years. Anyway, the gap betwee...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, anyway, however, if, look, so, in conclusion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 754.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 153.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92810457516 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51700396316 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81698588174 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.627450980392 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 218.7 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.2337027248 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.25 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.125 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.625 5.23603664747 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1959626703 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.082406558305 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0781554916547 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124413317783 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0669823206418 0.0819641961636 82% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.