The opinion is divided as to whether governments should spend more budget on the railway system rather than the road system or not. In my opinion, I agree with the statement due to many issues like global warming and traffic problem came from using a car mostly.
Based on statistics and researches, around 80% of greenhouse gas is released by car, and the number of personal cars in 2019 increases significantly from 10 years ago. Nowadays, our world is confronting hot temperatures in many places that were colder before, for example, ice glaciers are now melting due to a higher temperature in the North Pole. This is the problem that we need to fix it as soon as possible which one possible solution is reducing the number of cars. Most people think of personal car is the most flexible and comfortable way of moving from place to place because they are now lacking appropriate railway systems like a subway or sky train.
Therefore, it is the time the government should support the idea of railways more than ever. Firstly, Japan is the best model for this, having over 100 million of populations but excellent traffic conditions even in a capital city like Tokyo that because there are fantastic subways that connect everywhere within the city and between the city. So, the demand for using car reduces significantly, and it is followed by lower air pollution. To do that, governments have to obstruct people from using a car as much as they can by increasing tax or gas, developing railways at the same time. We all know, changes cannot happen suddenly, it only has to do gradually but right now we need some sign of revolution.
In conclusion, using a car is made a lot of global issues but it is the most common transportation by this century. One of the best solutions is to reduce car usage and develop other transportation instead.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 24, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
The opinion is divided as to whether governments should spend more budget on...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, so, therefore, as to, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1533.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76086956522 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70109398627 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590062111801 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.376949078 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.923076923 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7692307692 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.76923076923 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138427171456 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0503876138922 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0449823664278 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0866026961667 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0592506400059 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.