Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Advanced public transportation networks is a sign of developed countries in today modern world, It is been argued that authorities must utilize more money in train railways instead of roads. I believe it is a money well spent on railways and can bring several advantages.
To begin with, many citizens cannot afford the luxury of owning a car and effective railways system will be an added value to easy commuting. For instance, in European countries the taxes over cars is high which makes owning a vehicle a challenge. In contrast, they build proper train system which even the people who are owners of cars are using it during their daily routine of attending work due to its convenient and peace of mind. As a result, the number of cars on the road during rush hours decreased which means less traffic jams. Subsequently, air became less polluted hence healthier life.
On the other hand, this might not be a helpful scenario for the people who are resident in villages and remote areas because usually government does not extend the railways to those areas due to the count of the population and the statistics figures of public transport usage since the majority depends on cars. Neglecting the development of roads in such areas lead to comfortless travel. Moreover, it could lead to cars mechanical fault and wear tires.
In conclusion, Transportation systems are vital and part of most human daily life. Authorities increasing the fund of railways is beneficial for the society and environment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 85, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'railways'' or 'railway's'?
Suggestion: railways'; railway's
...he luxury of owning a car and effective railways system will be an added value to easy c...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 315, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...oper train system which even the people who are owners of cars are using it during thei...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, moreover, so, well, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1263.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 252.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0119047619 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69958832934 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.626984126984 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 387.0 506.74238477 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.2311164814 49.4020404114 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.25 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.83333333333 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.094057319749 0.244688304435 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0308845407914 0.084324248473 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0310827524453 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.055442520027 0.151304729494 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0159355433071 0.056905535591 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.