Changing in the food industry have happened because of the progress of technology in the 20th century in terms of cooking materials. Some people believe that the convenience of food preparation positively changes people standards. This essay will discuss the change of way of cooking that brings benefits to people.
With fast growing of technology in this century changes the way of people living, from the era of industrialization to the globalization. These days many companies are stronger in terms of the production process and cost-saving process. The process of production, with creating immense goods makes things cheaper especially foods and food materials. Therefore, all benefits bring to the consumer directly, we can buy cheaper food compared to the past. Furthermore, the way of doing business is now changed. In the past, traditional trade was everywhere but their efficiency was far from modern trade. Today, everything can be found in a mall or a supermarket with cost leadership and a better location. People travel to sellers easily and more comfortable with everything gathering in a supermarket.
Moreover, many complicated raw materials are provided in a supermarket. In the past, doing so might need some time and a complex process. But current sellers provide that in the form of ready to eat food, making immense money to companies. With just a few steps in a microwave, food is ready to eat, making life easier. This is very popular among blue collars, especially in rush hour. In addition, many materials from far away countries are rare in some area; for example, Thailand, the country in an equator area impossibly finds raw materials in cold environment like a strawberry or a salmon. But now it is easy to get them everywhere in a supermarket. So now, we can cook some great food with foreign materials easily.
In conclusion, now people have more convenience at finding and making food because of sophistication in terms of cost, process and product variety.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, therefore, for example, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1676.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14110429448 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96444104732 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542944785276 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 520.2 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.9282618561 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.8 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.3 7.06120827912 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 8.67935871743 184% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14738253514 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0477967942417 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0492426171663 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102821392111 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.055624921438 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.